Informed decision making in persons acquitted not guilty by reason of insanity.

نویسندگان

  • R L Elliott
  • E Nelson
  • W L Fitch
  • R Scott
  • G Wolber
  • R Singh
چکیده

Deciding to raise an insanity defense carries serious consequences. This is especially true for persons charged with minor offenses, for whom an acquittal not guilty by reason of insanity (NGRI) might lead to a longer period of incarceration than would conviction. Before raising an insanity defense, a defendant should be provided with information necessary to make an informed decision and should be competent to understand the consequences of the verdict. This study attempted, through retrospective review and concurrent evaluation, to determine the degree to which trial courts in Virginia attended to these important aspects of informed decision making before finding defendants charged with misdemeanors NGRI. The study also attempted to assess the degree to which defendants were competent and informed at the time of adjudication. In most instances, trial courts did not consider defendants' competence to make decisions regarding the insanity defense and did not consider whether defendants were informed about the consequences of a successful insanity defense at the time of adjudication. The average length of stay for these patients was (at least) 21 months; most would have been released earlier had they been committed civilly rather than committed as a result of insanity pleas. We stress the need to educate judges, attorneys and forensic evaluators to the importance of considering defendants competence to plead insanity and of providing information about the consequences of a successful plea. We also propose that laws be changed to recognize the importance of these elements in the decision making process regarding pleas of insanity.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Criminal Law: Commitment and Release of Criminal Defendants Acquitted by Reason of Insanity

WHEN THE DEFENDANT in a criminal case is found not guilty by reason of insanity,' a proper solution to his disposition seeks to satisfy three possibly conflicting considerations. Society demands that dangerous persons be prevented from causing further harm; legal tradition demands that liberty be taken away only by due process of law5 modem scientific knowledge demands that the psychiatric aspe...

متن کامل

Impact of change in legal standard for those adjudicated not guilty by reason of insanity 1975-1979.

In Michigan, during the middle of the last decade, a combination of new legislation and a state supreme court ruling significantly altered the definition of legal insanity and the disposition of those individuals that were adjudicated Not Guilty by Reason of Insanity (NGRI). In early September 1974, the Michigan Supreme Court upheld a lower court's ruling in People v. McQuillan that found the s...

متن کامل

The insanity defense in Illinois -- a psychiatric perspective.

The insanity defense has come under increasingly strong attack by both lawyers! and psychiatrists,2 at least in part, because of its lack of clarity in relating mental illness to criminal responsibility. Recent scholarly publications3.4 have exhaustively reviewed the pertinent medical-legal, social, and philosophical issues surrounding the contemporary debate regarding retention or abolition of...

متن کامل

Empirical research on the insanity defense and attempted reforms: evidence toward informed policy.

This paper addresses some common questions about the insanity defense and issues raised by commonly proposed "reforms." The first section begins with a brief description of the insanity defense and the reasons for its existence in the law. It then examines some of the popular myths and public misperceptions surrounding the insanity defense. The next three sections discuss proposed "reforms" and...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • The Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law

دوره 21 3  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 1993